技术出口新规是酝酿对TikTok美国业务交易进行监管？外交部回应

2020年8月31日外交部发言人赵立坚主持例行记者会

彭博社记者：外交部能否证实有关“限制措施”意味着TikTok需要获得相关许可才能和美国公司达成收购协议？中方出台的技术出口新规包括字节跳动用在TikTok平台上的技术，中方此举是否意在对正在酝酿的TikTok美国业务出售交易进行监管？

Bloomberg： Is the foreign ministry able to confirm whether TikTok will be required to seek regulatory approval for a sale to a US company？ Are the new restrictions on exports that cover technologies ByteDance uses for TikTok aimed at ensuring China has oversight over any sale？

赵立坚：你提到的有关“限制措施”指的是商务部日前会同科技部制定、调整并公布禁止或限制出口的技术目录吧？

Zhao Lijian： You were talking about the catalog of technologies that are banned or restricted for export， which was established， revised and released jointly by the Ministry of Commerce （MOFCOM） and the Ministry of Science and Technology， right？

商务部已经就有关事项发布了消息，商务部服贸司负责人就调整发布目录回答了记者提问，强调发布有关技术目录主要目的是规范技术出口管理，促进科技进步和对外经济技术合作，维护国家经济安全。有关技术目录如何执行，请向中方主管部门了解。

MOFCOM has released information on the relevant matter． Official in charge of MOFCOM‘s Department of Trade in Services and Commercial Services took questions from the press on the revised catalog， stressing that catalog of technologies aims to regulate the management of technology export， advance science， technology and economic and technological cooperation with other countries， and safeguard China’s economic security． I‘d refer you to the competent authorities for the specifics regarding the implementation of the revised catalog．

我对企业的具体运营不作评论。有关企业已经发布了相关消息，你可以查阅。中方多次明确表示，我们反对美国泛化国家安全概念，滥用国家力量，无理打压别国特定企业。美方企图对非美国企业采取经济霸凌和政治操弄的伎俩，无论是“政府胁迫交易”，还是“政府强制交易”，都无异于巧取豪夺，不仅违反市场原则和国际规则，也是对美方自己一贯标榜的市场经济和公平竞争原则的讽刺。

I don‘t comment on the operation specifics of companies． The pertinent company has released information which you may refer to． As China clearly stated on many occasions， we oppose the US practices of stretching the concept of national security and abusing national power to oppress certain foreign businesses． The tricks of economic bullying and political manipulation that the US played on non-American companies， no matter they are “coerced transaction by government” or “forced transaction by government”， are disguised and coercive robbery． It violates the market principles and international rules， and reveals the irony when the US boasts itself to be a champion of market economy and fair competition．

责任编辑：梁斌 SF055